false, most tend to favor the Democrats.

The Democratic Party, once dominant in the Southeastern United States, is now strongest in the Northeast (Mid-Atlantic and New England), Great Lakes region, and the Pacific Coast (including Hawaii). The Democrats are also very strong in major cities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_...

The Democratic Party, once dominant in the Southeastern United States, is now strongest in the Northeast (Mid-Atlantic and New England), Great Lakes Region, as well as along the Pacific Coast (especially Coastal California), including Hawaii. The Democrats are also strongest in major cities. Recently, Democratic candidates have been faring better in some southern states, such as Virginia, Arkansas, and Florida, and in the Rocky Mountain states, especially Colorado, Montana, Nevada, and New Mexico.

Since 1980, geographically the Republican "base" ("red states") is strongest in the South and West, and weakest in the Northeast and the Pacific Coast. The Republican Party's strongest focus of political influence lies in the Great Plains states, particularly Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska, and in the western states of Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah.

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Democra...

This scenario may fit the experience of large numbers of U.S. cities where the Republican Party is rarely a competitive force, but Democratic Party politics have become increasingly divisive as the white share of the urban electorate has declined. Especially in those cities that have not seen appreciable out-migration by natives, but have seen growth from international sources, it makes sense that the explanation for increasing

Democratic electoral majorities lies in the native calculation that fighting within Democratic ranks makes better sense than converting to the hopelessly overmatched Republicans. After all, there was little chance that the new immigrant arrivals would elect their own officeholders anytime soon, as that kind of upward political progress would take a generation or more. By this logic, then, natives became a larger share of the Democratic electorate, but immigrants did as well. Both contributed, and are contributing, to the extinction of urban (and increasingly suburban) Republicans as the immigrant population expands its presence outward from its original central-city destinations (Frey 2006).

http://www.cis.org/republican-demise

True.

Maps of the 2008 US presidential election results
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/elec...

A blue state tends to vote for the Democratic Party.

A red state tends to vote for the Republican Party.

Major U.S. Cities:
http://www.americanhospitals.com/questio...

There is a predicable ratio, of course. However, with a large number of unregistered or non-voting registered voters, like during Obama's run for office, the ratio can abruptly change. This change is noticeable before hand with the Governor's, Mayor's, and Police Chief's race for election.

False.


Most major cities are composed of minorities and blue collar workers. They tend to be Democrats. The data source is listed below. You will have to dig to find about your specific city or cities.

I would say no. Watch the 2012 re-election of BO