Ask Questions, Get Answers
1,500
Points
Asked by selrachco 1 year ago in politics
I think if it was over hot buttered popcorn Pee Wee would definately have the advantage and home court advantage too, but if it was Fresh off the cob, then Rush would.
All Answers
Sort By
Show
Richard / Retired Dentist
Answered 1 year ago
-
Since a current topic of conversation is whether Rush Limbaugh and President Obama will have a debate, are you calling President Obama Pee Wee Herman?
If so, I think you should apologize and take it back.

Rush spends many hours each day in show preparation and gets feedback from his listeners. I think that makes him a tough debater on any subject.
Women do not like rush, men seem to. And yes, I watched Rush's address to the nation on C-SPAN and I did not think his dress was quite appropriate. His crowd gave him lots of cheers.

Rush is sort of famous for his parties and seems to know about refreshments. If you made $35 million a year, you could throw some good parties too.
Answered 1 year ago
-
If it was a room full of Republicans, Rush would win hands down.

It it was a room full of Democrats, Pee Wee Herman would win hands down.

That's the sad state of politics in the US.
Answered 1 year ago
-
Politicians generally have the gift of the gab and Rush Limbaugh or your Pee Wee aka President Obama are both two very matured politicians and they know how to handle the situation.Politicians of developed countries always search for the economical growth of nation and popularity rather than simply personal attacks.So I don't expect any of them to get mad of simple poking,jocking from the opposite party.I have heard many talk shows,interviews,lectures fro each of them and doesn't seem to me that they will not engaged into silly debate on casual matters.That's pretty habitual from the politicians.Although its common that they may have different attitude,mind set and personality that's shown on CNN,BBC or other Television channel Media.So i don't see any reason to send them into a battle field face to face and getting in debate,quarrel ,cursing and slander.I don't like to insult,criticize any other by making jokery mokary comment if they are not taken any attacking action to opposite.And I don't want to support blindly any of them,as they are in their positions.But i would support good works of both.Cheers!
Source My own opinion
whatever_it_is Lizzy / Happy-Pooper
Answered 1 year ago
-
Rush Limbaugh in a heartbeat. He'd crush poor Pee Wee Herman down to a can of Spam and have him served for breakfast in one of those Mega Omelets they serve at IHOP.
kc5255 (KarenCARES) {{hugs}} ☺♥ / NO WORRIES
Answered 1 year ago
-
If it based on true intelligence Pee Wee Herman would wipe the floor with the psuedo intellectual Limpbaugh. ☺ Rush Limbaugh is a waste of humanity. He expresses hatred in every word he spews. Pee Wee Herman would never debate Rush. He is by far a more intelligent human being. Debating would give Rush glory that he does not deserve. It wouldn't be a debate it would be a Rush sweat and spit fest with a lot of loud obnoxious whining. We need to quit listening to fools like Rush and Fox news. ☻
jehubuddaka Rickie / Installation Engineer
Answered 1 year ago
-
On Rush's talk show, I'd say Rush hands down, because he can always hit the mute button so that he can talk over whoever he wants to. In a live event, without any kind of mediation, it would come down to who could yell the loudest, as it always does, which sickens me. With each allowed to speak only after their opponent speaks, I feel they would each site facts that would contradict the other side's and, therefore, one would be lying. This also sickens me. Basically US politics as it stands today is completely disgusting. I will vote for the first time once I believe in a candidate. Once I feel that he/she/it is just speaking from his/her heart and mind instead of from a script written by professionals, and I agree with what he/she is saying, I will vote. Until then, I'm a disgruntled American with no affiliations, although I tend to lean to the conservative side(I dont like taxes).
Source thoughts
Answered 11 months ago
-
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=" http://www.youtube.com/v/bbneI7FhBpM&... name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" http://www.youtube.com/v/bbneI7FhBpM&... type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Answered 11 months ago
-
No Matter who ever win.. economy will continue to suck for a while.. but if i can get this $15.. i can assure you i will fix the economy in 84 hrs...
papade dennis / family man
Answered 11 months ago
-
although i don't agree with rush most of the time, i think he would win because he is not a politician and therefor would be in the position of being able to say anything to support the debate whether true or fiction. a politician does not have that luxury so would be restrained in his answers. a president is reelected on his popularity and not his content. given tough questions with unpopuler answers the president would not be able to say the things that people wouldn't want to hear. rush would go for the throat and oboma would smile and try to save his ass the way politicians always do. don't believe anything a politican tells you.
Need Answers Instantly?
About this Question
Answered Question
9 Answers 550 Views - Compliments
Asked by selrachco
(charles gray)
Level 5
Kindergarten
Asked 243
Questions
Rewarded 190
Best Answers
Question Discussion
Top Users this Week
joensf Level 20 Middle School
+303
Exp
worriedsick Level 31 College
+199
Exp
scott1289 Level 5 Kindergarten
+198
Exp
adw61 Level 17 Middle School
+164
Exp
Richard Level 50 Grad School
+139
Exp