Who you love and how you love them is as much a statement about your social conscience as the letters you write to Congress or the votes you cast. It's harder to be good to someone else.

People who want to see the world bettered -- made more just and honest and kind -- often set their gaze on the farthest horizon. Our instinct, as progressives with global perspectives, is to obsess over situations far afield...

Who you love and how you love them is as much a statement about your social conscience as the letters you write to Congress or the votes you cast. It's harder to be good to someone else.

People who want to see the world bettered -- made more just and honest and kind -- often set their gaze on the farthest horizon. Our instinct, as progressives with global perspectives, is to obsess over situations far afield of our own backyards -- Indonesia, Sudan, the Middle East. These situations stir a sort of Peace Corp romance within us, a love affair with that which might make us feel gallant and extraordinary for caring.

I am as guilty as the next bleeding heart of focusing the majority of my energies on problems I see as compelling in large part because of their strangeness to me. But when I sit with myself, quiet my righteous indignation, my whiny white guilt, my attachment to the idea that I am a humble truth teller among powerful fibbers, I realize that it is not the world outside of me that is in most desperate need of my world-changing instincts. It is the world inside of me, the world between me and my beloved.

We are so often wide awake about the decisions our elected officials make in the political, public realm and so asleep about our private choices. Our relationships can be sites of radical transformation but are so often soporifics. They have the capacity to tilt the whole world in the direction of ingenuity and kindness, and yet we are so often looking outside of ourselves for the tipping point.

Who you love and how you love them is as much a statement about your social conscience -- perhaps even a far more accurate and moving statement -- as the letters you write to Congress or the votes you cast. It is harder to be good to someone else. It has the potential to make them be good to others. And others are the fulcrum of social change.

Some of the ways in which love can be radical are quite obvious and tied to institutions. The choice of whether or not to get married in a nation where the status (and its tax benefits) is still doled out discriminatorily is a powerful one.

And, of course, beyond the obvious is the most critical -- what kind of relationship do you want to be in? What sort of partnership will push you to be your best, freest, happiest self? It is not just a matter of reversing roles or reacting to those models you have seen before, but wiping the slate clean and then imagining the most humane and transcendent of possible unions. How good could your love be? How fortifying? How honest? How can you create a love that reflects your values instead of parroting the culture's bottom line-driven definitions?

Think about Barack Obama, the product of a short-lived, early 60s college romance between a black African exchange student and a white Kansan. His interracial identity, as he so beautifully explains in his first book, is the roots from which his political ideals have grown. Fifty years after his parents fell in love, they are both gone but their creation is changing the way America understands itself.

Anyone who doubts that our most intimate relationship can also be the site of our most impactful activism need look no further than the second wave of feminism. A generation of women insisted that the personal was the political, that they would only be in relationship with those who respected their full humanity, and we -- their daughters and sons -- are engaged in far more fair partnerships as a result. (Though we have much more work to do if we are to fully realize their dream of equal parenting.)

And, of course, decades of queer men and women have bravely come out to their families and friends, colleagues and clergy, and in the process, redefined family. Their challenge of notions of normality have freed us all -- gay, straight, bisexual, weary of labels -- to be more honest about our own complex sexualities. Lives have been lost in this quest -- but countless lives have also been saved. Bell hooks, the guru of love as revolution, wrote: "The moment we chose to love we begin to move towards freedom.

It is not the moment we chose to love that we begin to move towards freedom, because love is so rarely a choice. Love is an instinct, an accident, an epiphany, a stomach ache. It can feel like incarceration and pardon, alienation and intimacy, tragedy and comedy. It so often grabs us by the collar and drags us in whatever direction it feels magnetized. We don't choose it. It harangues us.

It is the moment we critically and consciously choose how to shape our love that we move towards freedom. It is a critical response to our commercialized culture of romance, a rejection of that which feels outdated, a vision of a more inclusive, more authentic, more liberating relationship. In fact, the moment we choose to shape our love is the first, most critical step in shaping the whole God damn world.

Love... With a rich person. ;)

In normal world it is like that if you have money, you have "love".

But I have to say I would rather have love than money....

I pick love because is is more valuable and rarer than money. Often you get very few chances at love, but money you can mostly figure out ways to get eventually.
Having both makes life nice. Not having enough of either is hard.

Both ...!

I'd choose love, because when you truly have that everything else falls into place including finances. (which don't even really matter, because you got love)

I'll choose love, when you have family and you have love, money comes by itself...and ofcourse I'm from Pakistan so I'm more family-oriented so I would say that anyway. Money isn't everything, you finally end up in some troubles when you have a lot of it, and you spend without caring about the consequences.

I would choose love. To me, it doesn't matter how much money you have if you don't have someone you love to share it with.

in one of the bollywood movie songs means that a person needs love but love can not flourish without money in this material world.

Well, of course I'd have to know the context. I'd also have to know if you mean choosing between someone you love and a situation in which in order to have money you would have to leave this person. There are so many variables! BUT if the question is really, "What's more important? Money or love?" I'd say love. Genuine love is scarce and I do no believe anyone can be happy without it. Money can usually be found as soon as you put some effort into it. Maybe not as much as you'd like of course...but still enough...

Well, of course I'd have to know the context. I'd also have to know if you mean choosing between someone you love and a situation in which in order to have money you would have to leave this person. There are so many variables! BUT if the question is really, "What's more important? Money or love?" I'd say love. Genuine love is scarce and I do no believe anyone can be happy without it. Money can usually be found as soon as you put some effort into it. Maybe not as much as you'd like of course...but still enough to do okay. Doing "okay" with money, and feeling loved in the long run is a lot more rewarding, than being rich and having no love in your life. In fact without love, in my opinion, you aren't rich. You just have a lot of money. Big difference.

ALWAYS LOVE....everything else other than true love and care can be bought by money
But be a mere pauper or a prince if you dont have true love you still will be poorer than the poor man who has all the love but no money...
Money can be earned with hard work...But love is the social need of man.
If a person has all the money in the world but he/she is still lonely and without friends and love then whats the use of such a life he/she will just...

ALWAYS LOVE....everything else other than true love and care can be bought by money
But be a mere pauper or a prince if you dont have true love you still will be poorer than the poor man who has all the love but no money...
Money can be earned with hard work...But love is the social need of man.
If a person has all the money in the world but he/she is still lonely and without friends and love then whats the use of such a life he/she will just end up self destructing.